Tom Sickenberger vs Alen Mujakic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 15 Jul at 11:55 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Sickenberger vs A. Mujakic

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Sickenberger 1 - 0 Mujakic
They have played 3 sets in total, with Tom Sickenberger winning 2 and Alen Mujakic winning 1. The last match between Tom Sickenberger and Alen Mujakic was at the M15 Uslar, 15-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Tom Sickenberger getting the victory 4-6 6-3 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sickenberger | 1 |
| Mujakic | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Uslar(07-15-25)
T. Sickenberger vs A. Mujakic H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 30.43% (7-16) | Career Total W/L | 60.91% (67-43) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
T. Sickenberger vs A. Mujakic Match Preview:
- Mujakic has demonstrated superior second serve performance, securing 42.77% of points, compared to Sickenberger's 28.57%. How critical is this stat? A high correlation with match outcomes suggests it’s quite significant.
- When it comes to returning their opponent's second serve, Mujakic also outshines Sickenberger, winning 46.02% of points versus 33.33%.
- Both players show similar efficiency in first serve returns: Mujakic at 35.22% and Sickenberger at 34%.
- Under pressure, Sickenberger has a slight edge, saving 50% of breakpoints, while Mujakic has saved 46.34%.
- Over the past year, Mujakic boasts a strong match win rate of 63.04%, whereas Sickenberger has only managed a 20% win rate.
- Their preferred surface is clay, where Mujakic excels with a 67% win rate, starkly contrasting Sickenberger’s 13% on the same surface.
- Considering the quality of opponents, Mujakic has faced more challenging opponents, with an average rank of 215.13, while Sickenberger’s average opponent rank is 391.2.
- In deciding sets, Mujakic has a 33% win rate over the last 12 months. Could this stat be pivotal? Yes, as Sickenberger hasn’t won any deciding sets in that period.
- In terms of break point conversion, Sickenberger leads with 60% compared to Mujakic's 45.59%, indicating a potential advantage in converting chances under pressure.
Editorial Prediction (July 15, 2025, UTC):
In evaluating the players’ recent performance statistics, Mujakic seems to have a robust advantage in several critical areas. Mujakic's superior second serve and return game, along with their favorable performance against more skilled opponents, strongly indicate a high level of play.
Sickenberger, although demonstrating strength in breakpoint conversion and under-pressure scenarios, has not shown the same consistency in overall match victories. With Mujakic consistently performing well both in service and return games, they possess the necessary skill set to capitalize on scoring opportunities.
Given the disparities in overall match win percentages, second serve reliability, and return effectiveness, Mujakic emerges as the likely favorite to win this upcoming tennis match.
Tom Sickenberger vs Alen Mujakic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Sickenberger vs A. Mujakic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 10 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:33:29 | Average Match Time | 2:33:29 |
| 70% (54/77) | 1st Serve % | 49% (43/87) |
| 67% (36/54) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (28/43) |
| 57% (13/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (20/44) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (2/4) |
| 45% (39/87) | Return Points Win % | 36% (28/77) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
T. Sickenberger Recent Matches Played
A. Mujakic Recent Matches Played

T. Sickenberger vs A. Mujakic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30.43% (7/16) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.91% (67/43) |
| 33.33% (17/34) | Sets Win/Loss | 60.98% (150/96) |
| 42.23% (201/275) | Games Win/Loss | 54.15% (1181/1000) |
| 57.14% (4/3) | Hard Win/Loss | 40.00% (2/3) |
| 20.00% (3/12) | Clay Win/Loss | 64.04% (57/32) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (8/8) |
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 18 | Aces Total | 118 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 52 | Total Double Faults | 156 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 97.04 | Average Opponent Rank | 48.34 |
| 65% (498/772) | 1st Serve % | 58% (2027/3511) |
| 57% (286/498) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (1257/2027) |
| 42% (114/274) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (727/1484) |
| 42% (25/59) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (199/442) |
| 37% (272/745) | Return Points Win % | 44% (1587/3613) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 30.43% (7/16) | Futures W/L | 61.47% (67/42) |
| 30% (7/23) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (67/108) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 80% (4/5) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 86% (12/14) |
| 40% (2/5) | Deciding Set Win % | 42% (11/26) |
| 75% (8/6) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (73/63) |
| 25% (8/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (73/10) |
| 7% (15/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 11% (37/4) |